A program runs the same year twice over: tryouts, a roster, a summer of getting in front of people, and then it all starts again. Most of what you learn along the way ends up in somebody else's system, or nobody's. ADAPT is one place it lands — round after round of testing, every school that has watched a player, and a way to close August out so September starts clean.
What every player is actually doing, what they have measured, and who has gone quiet.
Which schools watched which players, what camps are worth the drive, and what you can defend when a parent asks.
Every round of testing on one record, so you can show what a player has added rather than what he did once.
Access is invitation-only at the moment.
Development
Thirty players is too many to hold in your head, and the ones who need you are rarely the ones who ask. The list carries the answer: who has gone quiet, whose arm is flagged, who still has no number and no sizes.
Exposure
Every program tells families it gets players seen. Almost none can say by whom, at which event, and on what date. This is the part that makes that answerable — and it is deliberately strict about it: an event only counts once somebody has confirmed who actually turned up.
Recruiting
A recruiting database is only worth what its worst record is worth. Coaching staff turns over every autumn and nobody notices until an email bounces — so the app reads the school's own coaches page and tells you when a record was last confirmed against it.
Growth
Most facilities test. The radar gun has its own app, the cage has another, the force plate has a third, and the winter assessment is on a spreadsheet somebody keeps on a laptop. Every one of those systems can tell you what a player did that day. None of them can tell you what he has done since.
ADAPT is the one place it all lands. Run an assessment monthly, quarterly, or twice a year — each round goes onto the same record, so the answer stops being what did he throw in March and becomes what has he added since November. That is the number a program is actually selling.
And once you can see movement, ranking a squad becomes the wrong way to show it. Telling a fifteen-year-old he is eleventh is true and useless. A band says something he can act on: here is the range you are in, here is the next one, here is the number that gets you there. A sophomore and a senior throwing 80 are chasing the same next step.
And then it turns over
Closing a year is the job every program does badly, because nothing is built for it. ADAPT makes it one screen: a short review for every player, a private note on whether you expect them back, and next year's team set while you are already thinking about them.
Top strengths, what to work on, and closing comments. Nothing is sent until you close the year, so a half-written note stays private.
Mark a player as returning and place him there and then. Closing applies it, and clears everyone else so the roster can be built.
Last season's verified exposure is filed away, still counted for every player and every school, just off the screen you are planning with.
The share you expected back, and from the following year, the share who actually were. The gap between the two is the useful part.
Plainly
Players keep their account if they leave. You see training summaries and what your coaches graded — not a family's full record.
We don't sell anything about anyone, there's no advertising, and nobody is profiled for any purpose but running the product.
Evaluations are stamped with who wrote them, so a report is never anonymous. Sharing one account is possible and a bad idea.
Built for real programs in real seasons, and it changes most weeks. If something is wrong for you, say so.
Tell us how many players, how many teams, and what August currently looks like.